This often means that patients get fed up and frustrated . Because they have wasted so much time, money and energy on failed IUI treatment cycles, they are very reluctant to pursue more effective treatment options.
On the other hand, IVF specialists tend to overprescribe IVF treatment. In many couples , IUI is a simple and less expensive option but instead of giving this a fair trial, IVF clinics recommended IVF straight away.
So what is a confused patient supposed to do ?
I think the trick to making a well informed decision is to weigh the pros and cons of both options. Each has advantages and disadvantages and you need to decide what is right for you.
Often the major consideration is not medical , but something which many doctors – and patients - overlook. This is the trade-off between time and money. IUI costs less money , but because it has a low success rate , it takes longer to conceive with IUI, as compared to IVF. IVF is more expensive, but it has a much higher success rate . For patients for whom money is not a constraint, I suggest that they go for IVF directly , if they want to get pregnant quickly. It might seem mercenary that medical treatment decisions are being based on the ability of the patient to pay, but we need to remember that what infertile couples are really looking for is a baby - they usually don't care about how they achieve their goal ! For many of them, if IVF increases their chances of getting pregnant as compared to IUI , this becomes their preferred option, because they would rather spend more money to get a baby quickly rather than waste time on IUI , in order to save money !
Thank you for your coherent and simple answer. I have been searching the web for the answer to this very question and have found nothing that laid it out as simply as you did!
ReplyDeleteI, too, would like to thank you! My DH and I are in the middle of this right now. We're trying to think of costs. we (well, I) have to have a laparoscopy b4 IUI because of possible adhesions from a major abdominal surgery when I was 16...SO, that's another added cost we'd have to pay. Take that into account, the lowered success rate, and the probability of having to do IUI again...In my case, it seems IVF would ataully be more cost effective...or at least almost!
ReplyDelete