The
commonest question which a patient asks their IVF doctor is, "What are my
chances of getting pregnant?" Now this is a deceptively simple question , but
the answer can be surprisingly complicated, which is why most doctors will take
one of two approaches to answer this.
Most will
provide a highly inflated figure , because their only purpose is to make sure
that the patient comes to them for treatment. So they'll say state some
outrageous figure like 70% per cycle — an arbitrary number they pull out of
their hat—and they have no way of being able to prove that this is the right
number. Unfortunately , patients are not sophisticated enough to ask them to
verify this figure, and because most Indian patients still have blind trust in
their doctor , they will assume that this number is correct. Being naïve and
gullible doesn't help , but patients are emotionally vulnerable, and doctors take
advantage of this.
The better
method is to provide a more tailored figure , based on the patient's age, her medical
diagnosis and ovarian reserve—all the various biological factors which affect her
chances of success. The problem here is that doctors can't be fortune-tellers ,
and it's impossible to predict for the individual patient what her chances are
going to be.
The truth
is that we are able to answer this question much more accurately after doing
the IVF cycle, because this gives us a
chance to assess the quality and the quality of her embryos. However, patients
doesn't want to wait till after the cycle—they want an answer right now ! This
is why we sit and explain to patients that the number we provide as regards her
chances of getting pregnant is just an estimate , based on : her medical
history ; whether she has been pregnant in the past; the outcome of her earlier
IVF cycles; her age (as you get older the chances decline , because egg quality
declines) ; and her ovarian reserve, as assessed by measuring her AMH level and
her antral follicle count. The problem is that are all rough estimates – after all,
the final proof of the pudding is in the eating, and for an individual patient
in a single IVF cycle, the success rate is either 100% or 0% !.
A better way
of answering the question is to say, "In our experience, for patients like
you , in your age group , with similar AMH levels and antral follicle counts,
the pregnancy rate in our clinic has been
X % in the past. However, we will be able to answer this question more precisely
once we've done your cycle for you, as we will be able to assess your
biological response more accurately."
Thus, patients
need to understand that there's a difference between ovarian reserve and
ovarian response. Reserve is just a static number, measured by testing antral
follicle counts and AMH levels – and we don’t treat numbers – we treat patients
! We are much more interested in the
ovarian response, which is dynamic – how well does the patient respond to the
IVF superovulation, and how good are her embryos ?
The problem
with a dynamic result is we cannot predict it in advance, because the body is
so complicated , and it is affected by many biological variables, not all which
can be measured. The truth is that every patient is different, and when the
doctor is being honest, it may appear that he is trying to hedge his bets, or
is not being forthright.
However, a
good doctor is trying to be as truthful as possible, based on his clinical
assessment, so that you have realistic expectations of what IVF treatment can
offer you ! Biological systems are complex and unpredictable, and patients need
to learn to come to terms with this uncertainty.
This is why
it's so important that you find an IVF doctor you can trust , so you have peace
of mind you have done your best !
Need help in getting pregnant ? Please send me your medical details by filling in the form at www.drmalpani.com/free-second-opinion so that I can guide you !
No comments:
Post a Comment